George Foreman GGR50B vs GFO240S: My Honest Experience with Two Indoor/Outdoor Grills

Some grills just make life easier, especially when you live in a space where propane or charcoal isn’t an option. A few months back, I started testing out electric grills for my small patio and occasional indoor gatherings. That’s when I got my hands on two very popular George Foreman models — the GGR50B and the GFO240S.

Both promise the same thing: big grilling capacity, apartment-friendly design, and healthier cooking with George Foreman’s signature fat-removing slope. But once I spent a few weeks cooking on both, I realized that while they’re very similar, there are subtle differences that might make one a better fit depending on how and where you plan to use it.

Let me walk you through my full comparison of the George Foreman GGR50B vs GFO240S, based on real cooking sessions, cleanup experiences, and everything in between.

Key Difference Between George Foreman GGR50B and GFO240S Indoor/Outdoor Grill

If you look at the specs side by side, you’ll notice these grills share almost identical DNA: 15-serving capacity, removable stand, nonstick surface, fat-removing slope, and indoor/outdoor flexibility.

The biggest difference I noticed? The GGR50B gives you more control with its adjustable temperature probe (five heat settings), while the GFO240S feels like a more streamlined, simplified version of the same grill — reliable but without the same degree of adjustability.

So, in short:

• GGR50B = More control, slightly more premium feel, adjustable temperature.
• GFO240S = Straightforward, reliable, and slightly simpler setup.

Quick Comparison Table: George Foreman GGR50B and GFO240S Indoor/Outdoor Grill

Feature	George Foreman GGR50B	George Foreman GFO240S
Cooking Capacity	15+ servings (240 sq. in.)	15+ servings (240 sq. in.)
Temperature Control	Adjustable with 5 heat settings	Standard electric heating
Nonstick Coating	George Tough nonstick coating	George Tough nonstick coating
Fat-Removing Slope	Yes (removes up to 42% fat)	Yes (patented slope design)
Stand	Removable, patio-to-countertop use	Removable, patio-to-countertop use
Color Options	Black (some silver editions)	Silver
Indoor/Outdoor Approved	Yes (apartment-friendly, no propane/charcoal)	Yes (apartment-friendly, no propane/charcoal)
Check Price	Buy on Amazon	Buy on Amazon

My Hands-On Experience with Both Models

1. Design & Build Quality

When I unboxed the GGR50B, I immediately liked the sturdy feel of the stand. It clicked into place with ease and felt stable on my patio, even on uneven tiles. The lid has a slightly more polished look, and overall, it gave off a more modern vibe compared to older George Foreman designs.

The GFO240S, on the other hand, looked a little more basic but still solid. The silver color made it stand out, and I appreciated how straightforward the setup was. The stand was sturdy enough for outdoor grilling, but I noticed the GGR50B’s base felt just a little more refined.

Winner in Design: GGR50B, though the GFO240S is just as practical.

2. Ease of Use

This is where the temperature control on the GGR50B really stood out. Having five adjustable heat settings gave me confidence when cooking more delicate items. I could dial it down for veggies and fish or crank it up for burgers and steaks. It reminded me of using a stovetop burner — I always knew where my heat was.

The GFO240S doesn’t have the same adjustable probe. It heats up quickly and evenly, but you don’t get the same level of flexibility. For straightforward grilling, it was fine, but I found myself missing the control when cooking thicker cuts of meat.

Winner in Ease of Use: GGR50B.

3. Cooking Performance

Both grills have the same 240 sq. in. circular surface, which really does hold about 15 servings. I put this to the test during a family gathering and easily grilled 10 burgers and a batch of skewers at once.

On the GGR50B, my steaks had great grill marks, and I liked being able to tweak the temperature when I switched over to salmon and veggies. The heat consistency was impressive for an electric grill.

The GFO240S performed well too, but since it’s a “set it and forget it” style, it felt more suited to casual grilling. It cooked evenly but didn’t give me as much control over searing. Still, it produced tasty results — and no flare-ups to worry about indoors.

Winner in Performance: GGR50B (for versatility), though the GFO240S gets points for simplicity.

4. Cleanup & Maintenance

Both models use the George Tough nonstick coating, and I’ll be honest — this was a game-changer. Food slides off easily, and I never once felt the need to use oil or butter. A quick wipe-down with a damp cloth after cooling was usually enough, though occasionally I used a nylon scrubber for tougher bits.

The fat-removing slope worked equally well on both. Grease collected in the tray without much mess, and I noticed how much healthier my burgers looked compared to using a flat grill pan.

Winner in Cleanup: Tie — both are equally low-maintenance.

5. Portability & Indoor/Outdoor Use

This was one of my favorite aspects of both models. Being able to grill on my patio one day and bring it inside the next felt incredibly convenient.

The removable stand made it possible to go from patio setup to countertop cooking in minutes. On a rainy day, I grilled skewers indoors without worrying about propane or smoke, and when the sun came back out, I clipped the stand back on and grilled outdoors.

Both models are apartment-approved, which means no complaints from landlords or neighbors.

Winner in Portability: Tie — both models are equally versatile.

George Foreman GGR50B Indoor/Outdoor Electric Grill

Pros:

• Adjustable temperature control (5 settings).
• Sturdy, removable stand for indoor/outdoor flexibility.
• Nonstick coating is durable and easy to clean.
• Large capacity (15+ servings).
• Apartment-friendly, no charcoal or propane needed.

Cons:

• Slightly bulkier design.
• Lid design feels less “premium” compared to newer grills.

Buy on Amazon

George Foreman GFO240S Indoor/Outdoor Electric Grill

Pros:

• Same large 15+ serving capacity.
• Easy-to-use design, no complicated controls.
• Sleek silver finish.
• Sturdy stand for outdoor use.
• Apartment-approved and electric-powered.

Cons:

• No adjustable temperature control.
• Simpler build — feels less refined than GGR50B.

Buy on Amazon

Final Verdict: George Foreman GGR50B vs GFO240S Electric Grill

After weeks of testing, here’s how I’d sum it up:

• The George Foreman GGR50B is the better choice if you want more cooking control and a slightly more polished design. The adjustable temperature probe really sets it apart, especially for people who cook a variety of foods.
• The George Foreman GFO240S is perfect for those who want straightforward grilling without fussing over heat levels. It’s simple, reliable, and does the job for large gatherings just as well as the GGR50B.

If I had to pick just one, I’d personally go with the GGR50B. The adjustable heat control made a noticeable difference in my cooking experience, especially when switching between meats and veggies. But if you prefer a simpler, “plug in and grill” option, the GFO240S is a great alternative.

Either way, both of these George Foreman grills deliver on their promise: big servings, healthier cooking, and indoor/outdoor convenience that takes the stress out of grilling.